Intel Core i5 8400 6-core LGA 1151
Intel
61 综合评分
vs
CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 7443 24-core AMD Socket SP3
CG CHIPS GATE
74 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core i5 8400 6-core LGA 1151
88 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价
用户对这款CPU非常满意，称赞其性能、低温运行和性价比。它能很好地处理游戏和日常任务，一位用户提到了一流的基准测试分数。小缺点包括时钟速度规格的差异和GPU价格过高，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 性能出色
- 运行低温
- 性价比高
- 游戏处理良好
- 稳定可靠
缺点
- 时钟速度规格差异
- GPU价格过高（外部）
Performance 5
Value for money 4
Cool operation 3
Gaming capability 3
Stability 2
Clock speed spec 1
CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 7443 24-core AMD Socket SP3
暂无用户反馈
评分
Productivity
Ai Llm
Budget
Gaming
Server
Efficiency
规格
| Intel Core i5 8400 | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 7443 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Core i5 | EPYC |
| Model | 8400 | 7443 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Milan |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 14 | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 6 | 24★ |
| P-cores | — | 24★ |
| Threads | 6 | 48★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 1.5 | 12★ |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | 64★ | — |
| ECC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1151 | AMD Socket SP3 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | ||
| TDP | 65★ | 200 |
| Max Turbo Power | 65★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
优缺点
Intel Core i5 8400 6-core LGA 1151
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (79th percentile)
- Strong affordability (71st percentile)
- Strong platform (69th percentile)
CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 7443 24-core AMD Socket SP3
- Strong ai (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong multi thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong efficiency (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong platform (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average affordability (5th percentile)5th %ile
价格
Intel Core i5 8400 6-core LGA 1151
CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 7443 24-core AMD Socket SP3
No current pricing available
结论
胜出: CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 7443
Scores 74 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 27 specs.
