Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27
Fujifilm
18 综合评分
vs
OM System OM-5 OM-5 Supersonic Wave Filter 2022
OM System
80 综合评分
评分
Travel
Beginner
Sports Wildlife
Vlogging
Video
Wedding Events
Streaming
Youtube
Photography
Product Photography
规格
| Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27 | OM System OM-5 OM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | Live MOS |
| Size | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | — | 20.399999618530273 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 200★ |
| Processor | — | TruePic IX |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 无数据 | |
| AF Type | — | Contrast Detection, Phase Detection: 121 (121 Cross-Type) |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.37 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 310 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | Micro-USB★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average display (28th percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
OM System OM-5 OM-5 Supersonic Wave Filter 2022
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong evf (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
结论
胜出: OM System OM-5 OM-5
Scores 80 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 24 of 31 specs.