SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Загальна оцінка
vs
Seagate FireCuda X1070 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda X1070 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
77 Загальна оцінка

Оцінки

Console
SanDisk
86
Seagate
69
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Seagate
62
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Seagate
69
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Seagate
77
Budget
SanDisk
72
Seagate
75
Portable
SanDisk
24
Seagate
19

Характеристики

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Seagate FireCuda X1070
Drive
Capacity
8,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
7,200
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
6,500
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
900,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
900,000
Hardware
NANDTLC★QLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
2,400
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★✗
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Плюси та мінуси

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Seagate FireCuda X1070 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong random (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong endurance (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong speed (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average feature (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile

Вердикт

★ Переможець: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Краще в:

GamingConsolePortableWorkstation

Seagate FireCuda X1070 Краще в:

BudgetLaptop