Patriot Viper Venom
Patriot
79 Pontuação geral
vs
CRUD3 CT16G4SFD832A
CRUD3
53 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Especificações
| Patriot Viper Venom | CRUD3 CT16G4SFD832A | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 260 |
| Rank | — | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 36 | 22★ |
| Timings | 36-36-36-76 | 22-22-22 |
| Voltage | 1.25 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Prós e Contras
Patriot Viper Venom
- Strong speed (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong latency (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
CRUD3 CT16G4SFD832A
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
Preços
Patriot Viper Venom0.158pontos por dólar
vs
CRUD3 CT16G4SFD832A0.287pontos por dólar
CRUD3 CT16G4SFD832A oferece 1.8x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Patriot Viper Venom
Scores 79 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
