Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
Alienware
83 Pontuação geral
vs
ViewSonic VA1653 15.6" Black
ViewSonic
33 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Portable
Gaming
Office
Entertainment
Creative
Professional
Especificações
| Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" | ViewSonic VA1653 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 32" | 15.6" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | VA | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,500 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 180 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms★ | 7 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits★ | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | DCI-P3 95% | 45% NTSC, 64% sRGB |
| Color Depth | — | 6-Bit+FRC |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | 0 |
| USB-C | 0 | 2★ |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | — | ✗ |
| Pivot | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | — |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 33W | 7W★ |
| Weight | 9.19 kg | 0.68 kg★ |
Prós e Contras
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong color (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
ViewSonic VA1653 15.6" Black
- Strong portability (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average color (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average performance (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average display (22nd percentile)
Preços
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
ViewSonic VA1653 15.6" Black
No current pricing available
Veredito
Vencedor: Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32"
Scores 83 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 28 specs.
