Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
Canon
74 Pontuação geral
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Especificações
| Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 17 |
| Groups | 12 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.61 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USM★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.23x | 0.5x★ |
Prós e Contras
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Veredito
Vencedor: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.