Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Pontuação geral
vs
Hasselblad
Hasselblad
35 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Especificações
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Hasselblad | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 16 |
| Groups | 11 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| ED Elements | 5 | 5 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 2.8-4 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Hasselblad XCD |
| Format | full-frame★ | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 2.92 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 86 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55 | 1:4.0 |
Prós e Contras
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
Hasselblad
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
Veredito
Vencedor: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.