Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple
95 Pontuação geral
vs
Cillso H97

Cillso H97

Cillso
53 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Budget
Apple
100
Cillso
59
Commute
Apple
96
Cillso
50
Travel
Apple
96
Cillso
50
Calls
Apple
94
Cillso
52
Fitness
Apple
91
Cillso
30
Gaming
Apple
81
Cillso
54
Music
Apple
75
Cillso
47

Especificações

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/ACillso H97
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesssemi-in-ear
Ear TipsXXS, XS, S, M, L
Weight0.09 kg
Audio
Driver TypeDynamicdynamic
Driver Size13 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive AudioENC
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.35.4
Multipoint
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs
Fast Charging5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening timeType-C fast charging
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs40 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count24
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSirivoice assistants
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP57IPX7

Prós e Contras

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Cillso H97

  • Strong mic (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong battery (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong anc (79th percentile)
  • Strong sound (78th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (31th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Veredito

Vencedor: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 6 of 34 specs.

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A Melhor em:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness