Fangflower X-EARBUD02

Fangflower X-EARBUD02

Fangflower
35 Totaalscore
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Totaalscore

Scores

Budget
Fangflower
41
TOZO
79
Gaming
Fangflower
35
TOZO
79
Travel
Fangflower
45
TOZO
78
Fitness
Fangflower
30
TOZO
72
Calls
Fangflower
37
TOZO
70
Commute
Fangflower
44
TOZO
70
Music
Fangflower
29
TOZO
68

Specificaties

Fangflower X-EARBUD02TOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.10 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsWireless Earbuds, Bluetooth Headphones with HiFi Stereo Noise Cancelling Mic, USB-C Charging Case, 50H Playtime with LED Display, IPX7 Water Resistant in Earphones for Sports, Travel, PinkLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery50 hrs35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX7IPX5

Voor- & Nadelen

Fangflower X-EARBUD02

  • Strong battery (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong anc (74th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Strong mic (70th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Oordeel

Winnaar: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Beter in:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness