SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
90 종합 점수
vs
Silicon Power A60 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Silicon Power A60 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Silicon Power
45 종합 점수

점수

Console
SanDisk
86
Silicon Power
25
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Silicon Power
43
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Silicon Power
49
Budget
SanDisk
72
Silicon Power
46
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Silicon Power
51
Portable
SanDisk
24
Silicon Power
13

사양

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Silicon Power A60
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
2,200
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
1,600
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
데이터 없음
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
데이터 없음
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
데이터 없음
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
데이터 없음
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

장단점

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Silicon Power A60 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Below average endurance (14th percentile)14th %ile

결론

★ 승자: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 더 나은 점:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation