Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18
Corsair
46 종합 점수
vs
Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC01
Team Group
87 종합 점수
점수
Workstation
Gaming
Server
Budget
Laptop
사양
| Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18 | Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC01 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 260 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 18★ | 38 |
| Timings | 18-19-19-39 | — |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | — |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
장단점
Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18
- Strong latency (67th percentile)
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC01
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong latency (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong capacity (85th percentile)85th %ile
가격
Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A2666C180.246달러당 점수
vs
Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC010.101달러당 점수
Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18 2.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Team Group FF9D548G8000HC38EDC01
Scores 87 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 15 specs.
