Fujifilm XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR 8-16mm
Fujifilm
76 종합 점수
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Tamron
100 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Macro
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Street
Travel
사양
| Fujifilm XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR 8-16mm | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 8 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 19 | 20 |
| Groups | 14 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| ED Elements | 6★ | 2 |
| Coating | Nano-GI (Gradient Index) coating | fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.25 kg | 0.59 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 88 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Linear motor | VXD linear motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.1x | 1:3.8★ |
장단점
Fujifilm XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR 8-16mm
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
가격
Fujifilm XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR 8-16mm0.051달러당 점수
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.122달러당 점수
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 2.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
