Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm

Sony
90 종합 점수
vs
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

Meike
42 종합 점수

점수

Travel
Sony
98
Meike
48
Street
Sony
92
Meike
39
Budget
Sony
91
Meike
39
Wildlife Sports
Sony
89
Meike
31
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Meike
27
Portrait
Sony
84
Meike
31
Landscape
Sony
82
Meike
42
Professional
Sony
81
Meike
33
Macro
Sony
65
Meike
28

사양

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mmMeike MK-S-35mm 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm35 mm
Elements96
Groups85
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements1
CoatingMulti-Layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.7
Constant
Diaphragm Blades78
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.11 kg0.18 kg
Filter Thread41 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusmanual focus only
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm300 mm
Max Magnification0.215x0.111x

장단점

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (71st percentile)
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)

가격

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm is €39 cheaper (1.2x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm0.413달러당 점수
vs
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm0.231달러당 점수

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm 1.8배 더 나은 가성비

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

결론

승자: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요