JLab HBELUXLABBLK5WEB
JLab
71 종합 점수
vs
JBL Tune 670NC
JBL
92 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Work
Music
Studio
Calls
사양
| JLab HBELUXLABBLK5WEB | JBL Tune 670NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | — | 0.17 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | Cloud Foam | soft ear cushions |
| Headband | — | padded headband |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Drivers | 2★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | 98 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 95 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codecs | SBC, LDAC, AAC | SBC, AAC, LC3 |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.3 |
| Profiles | HSP / HFP / A2DP / AVRCP | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Cable Length | — | 1.2192000150680542 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 90 hrs★ | 70 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 690 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4★ | 1 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | Jlab App | JBL Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
장단점
JLab HBELUXLABBLK5WEB
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
JBL Tune 670NC
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
가격
JLab HBELUXLABBLK5WEB0.407달러당 점수
vs
JBL Tune 670NC1.100달러당 점수
JBL Tune 670NC 2.7배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: JBL Tune 670NC
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 40 specs.
