AKG K371
AKG
41 종합 점수
vs
Poly Voyager 5200 7W6D3AA#ABA
Poly
41 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Studio
Music
Calls
Work
Budget
Commute
사양
| AKG K371 | Poly Voyager 5200 7W6D3AA#ABA | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.26 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | slow-retention foam | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 50 mm★ | 13.600000381469727 mm |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz★ | 100 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 114 dB★ | 90 dB |
| Codecs | — | Poly Voyager 5200 USB-A Office Wireless Bluetooth Headset TAA - Microsoft Teams Certification - Siri, Google Assistant - Mono - Over-the-ear - Monaural - In-ear - Black |
| Surround | — | 7.1 Virtual Surround |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, HFP, HSP, PBAP, SSP2 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | USB Type-A/ micro USB |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Cable Length | 3 m | 2.1600000858306885 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.600000023841858 hrs★ |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| App | — | Poly Lens |
장단점
AKG K371
- Strong sound (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average anc (33rd percentile)
Poly Voyager 5200 7W6D3AA#ABA
- Strong mic (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong anc (77th percentile)
- Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
- Below average battery (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average social proof (28th percentile)
가격
AKG K371
Poly Voyager 5200 7W6D3AA#ABA
No current pricing available
결론
승자: AKG K371
Scores 41 overall, wins 4 of 7 usage categories and 6 of 30 specs.
