MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 종합 점수
vs
AMD EPYC 7343 16-core SP3
AMD
75 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
사양
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | AMD EPYC 7343 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | AMD |
| Series | — | EPYC |
| Model | — | 7343 |
| Codename | — | Milan |
| Class | — | server |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 16★ |
| P-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | — | 32★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 1★ |
| L3 Cache | 데이터 없음 | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | SP3 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 데이터 없음 | |
| TDP | — | 190★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 200★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
장단점
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
AMD EPYC 7343 16-core SP3
- Strong ai (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong multi thread (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong platform (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong efficiency (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average affordability (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
가격
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
No current pricing available
AMD EPYC 7343 16-core SP3
결론
승자: AMD EPYC 7343
Scores 75 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 24 specs.
