AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+

AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+

AMD
48 종합 점수
vs
SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

SMC
80 종합 점수

점수

Productivity
AMD
50
SMC
94
Server
AMD
39
SMC
90
Ai Llm
AMD
42
SMC
85
Gaming
AMD
47
SMC
51
Budget
AMD
51
SMC
49
Efficiency
AMD
32
SMC
42

사양

AMD FX 9590SMC EPYC 9555P
Processor
BrandAMDAMD
SeriesFXEPYC
ModelFX-95909555P
CodenameVisheraTurin
Classdesktopserver
Process324★
Cores & Clocks
Cores864★
P-cores864★
Threads
8
128
Base Clock
4,700
3,200
Boost Clock
5,000
4,400
Cache
L2 Cache864★
L3 Cache
8
256
Performance
PassMark Multi
6,834
123,576
PassMark Single
1,807
3,410
Memory
Memory TypeDDR3DDR5★
Max Speed
1,866
6,000
ECC✓✓
Platform & Power
SocketAM3+AMD Socket SP5
PCIe—5.0
PCIe Lanes데이터 없음
128
TDP220★360
Max Turbo Power—400★
Unlocked✓★✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)—

장단점

AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+

  • Strong feature (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (34th percentile)

SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

  • Strong multi thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (91st percentile)91st %ile

가격

AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+

SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

No current pricing available

결론

★ 승자: SMC EPYC 9555P

Scores 80 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 25 specs.

AMD FX 9590 더 나은 점:

Budget

SMC EPYC 9555P 더 나은 점:

Ai LlmGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

이것도 고려해보세요