नया

Intel 670p Series 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

★★★★★ 4.8 (1,068)

The 3000 MB/s sequential read speed, nearly double the previous generation, makes this QLC NAND drive a fast option for everyday multitasking and gaming. Its 185 TBW endurance and 5-year warranty provide solid reliability for a budget-priced 512GB M.2 2280 NVMe drive. Best for budget-conscious desktop and laptop users who need a dependable, quick upgrade for everyday applications without paying premium prices.

Capacity 512GB
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4
Read Speed 3,000 MB/s
NAND QLC
Endurance 185 TBW
Intel 670p Series 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 ssd
63 ओवरऑल स्कोर

अभी किसी विक्रेता की मौजूदा कीमत नहीं है

इनमें भी उपलब्ध:

एक नज़र में

The 30-Second Version

The Intel 670p is the budget QLC drive done right, with a DRAM cache that keeps it snappy when others choke. It's not a speed demon, but for the price, it's one of the best value NVMe drives you can buy.

Pros & Cons

खूबियाँ

  • DRAM cache on a budget QLC drive is rare and makes a real difference 95th
  • Excellent value, especially when it's on sale 79th
  • 5-year warranty with 185 TBW endurance 79th
  • Runs cool in normal use and installs easily 78th

कमियाँ

  • QLC NAND means sustained write speeds drop off a cliff once cache fills
  • Heats up during heavy writes, and you may need a firmware update to fix thermal throttling
  • 512GB capacity is on the small side these days
  • Slower than high-end PCIe 3.0 and any PCIe 4.0 drive

मालिकों की राय

The Word on the Street

4.8/5 (1068 reviews)
👍 Buyers consistently rave about the value, especially when they snag one on sale, and the DRAM cache keeps performance feeling fast.
👍 Owners report easy installation and solid compatibility, including with older Macs and laptops, which is a nice bonus for a budget drive.
👎 A recurring gripe is heat during heavy writes, and some users needed a firmware update to stop thermal throttling.

मालिकों की राय समय के साथ कैसे बदली

विशेष

ग्राहकों ने वास्तव में अपनी समीक्षाएँ कब लिखीं, इसके आधार पर - ताकि आप देख सकें कि शुरुआती तारीफ़ टिकी या नहीं।

समय के साथ मालिकों की राय स्थिर रही है
88/100हमारा AI भावना विश्लेषणमध्यम विश्वसनीयता · 13 स्रोत · नव॰ 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '23: 5.0★ · 1 समीक्षाQ3 '23: 5.0★ · 3 समीक्षाएँQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 1 समीक्षाQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 1 समीक्षाQ3 '24: 4.7★ · 3 समीक्षाएँQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 2 समीक्षाएँQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 1 समीक्षाQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 1 समीक्षा13113211Q1 '23Q3 '23Q4 '23Q1 '24Q3 '24Q1 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26
औसत रेटिंगसंतुष्ट (4-5★)असंतुष्ट (1-2★)बार की ऊँचाई = समीक्षाओं की संख्या

13 तिथि-युक्त ग्राहक समीक्षाओं पर आधारित, कैलेंडर तिमाही के अनुसार समूहित। अवधि-वार विश्लेषण अंग्रेज़ी में है।

प्रमाण

Performance

The 3000 MB/s sequential read is solidly middle of the pack for PCIe 3.0 drives, and the 1600 MB/s write is about average too. But the random write IOPS of 315K is actually well above average, which surprised us. That's where the DRAM cache earns its keep. You'll notice it when you're installing updates, moving a bunch of small files, or doing anything that isn't just one giant file copy. The catch is sustained writes. Once that cache fills up, QLC NAND slows down hard. For most people, that's a non-issue. If you're regularly moving 100GB+ files around, you'll feel it, and you should be looking at TLC drives instead.

Performance Percentiles

Speed 56
Random 78.9
Feature 33.5
Capacity 34.6
User Sentiment 79
Endurance 77.7
सामाजिक प्रमाण 95.3
Affordability 60.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 512
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4
Protocol NVMe
PCIe Generation 3
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 3000
Sequential Write (MB/s) 1600
Random Read (IOPS) 110000
Random Write (IOPS) 315000

Hardware

NAND QLC

Reliability

Endurance (TBW) 185
MTBF (hours) 1600000
Warranty (years) 5

Features

Heatsink No
Hardware Encryption Yes

vs Competition

Against the Samsung 990 PRO or Crucial T500, the 670p looks slow. Those are PCIe 4.0 drives with TLC NAND and much higher endurance. But they also cost a lot more. The 670p isn't trying to compete with those. Its real competition is other budget QLC drives like the Crucial P3 or WD Blue SN570. Against those, the 670p wins on the DRAM cache alone. The P3 is DRAM-less and falls apart under sustained writes. The SN570 is TLC but also DRAM-less. If you're on a tight budget and want a drive that stays responsive, the 670p is the pick. If you need raw speed and endurance, save up for a TLC drive with DRAM.

Spec Intel 670p Series Samsung 9100 PRO Western Digital Black SN850X Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Crucial T500
Capacity 512GB 4TB 4TB 4TB 4TB 2TB
Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 PCIe 5.0 PCIe 4.0 x4
Seq Read 3,000 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 14,500 MB/s 7,400 MB/s
Nand Type QLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache - true true true false true
Endurance 185 TBW 2400 TBW 2400 TBW 4000 TBW 2400 TBW 1200 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
उत्पाद SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityUser SentimentEnduranceसामाजिक प्रमाणAffordability
Intel 670p Series 5678.933.534.67977.795.360.6
Samsung 9100 PRO Compare 99.399.899.792.508699.65.1
Western Digital Black SN850X Compare 8995.789.592.594.688.195.310.5
Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Compare 99.5999192.5093.587.16.4
Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Compare 99.199.289.592.508677.312
Crucial T500 Compare 9496.99978.4798395.319.5

कीमत

Value & Pricing

This is where the 670p shines. It's not the fastest drive, but it's one of the best values in the budget NVMe space. The DRAM cache alone puts it ahead of most QLC competitors at this price. If you can grab one on sale, it's a no-brainer for a boot drive or secondary game storage. At full price, it's still decent, but the value proposition gets shakier when faster TLC drives drop into the same range.

और पढ़ें

Overview

The Intel 670p is one of those drives that quietly does its job and doesn't ask for attention. It's a 512GB QLC NVMe drive with a DRAM cache, which is honestly the secret sauce here. Most budget QLC drives skip the DRAM to save a buck, and you feel it the second you push them hard. Intel didn't, and that's why this thing punches above its weight. The headline numbers are 3000 MB/s read and 1600 MB/s write, which won't set any records, but for everyday use, game loading, and general snappiness, it's plenty. The real story is value. At the prices these have been hitting, especially on sale, you're getting a dependable drive with a 5-year warranty and 185 TBW endurance. That's not spectacular endurance, but for a boot drive or game library, it's fine.

Common Questions

Q: Is the Intel 670p good for gaming?

Yeah, it's fine for gaming. Load times will be quick, and the DRAM cache helps with texture streaming and small file reads. Just don't expect it to match a PCIe 4.0 drive in raw throughput. For most games, you won't notice the difference.

Q: Will this work in my laptop?

If your laptop has an M.2 2280 slot with PCIe 3.0 x4 support, yes. It's a standard form factor and works in most modern laptops and desktops. Owners report good compatibility, including with older Macs. Just check your laptop's specs before buying.

Q: How long will this drive last?

Intel rates it for 185 TBW, which means you can write 185 terabytes to it before the warranty runs out. For a boot drive or game library, that's years of normal use. If you're writing hundreds of gigabytes a day, you'll want a TLC drive with higher endurance.

Who Should Skip This

If you're doing heavy video editing, constant large file transfers, or anything that hammers sustained writes, this isn't your drive. The QLC NAND slows down hard once the cache fills, and 185 TBW endurance won't hold up to that kind of abuse. Go grab a TLC drive like the Samsung 990 PRO or Crucial T500 instead. You'll pay more, but you'll get the endurance and sustained speed you need.

Verdict

The Intel 670p 512GB is a solid, dependable budget NVMe drive that outperforms its price point thanks to a DRAM cache most competitors skip. It's not the fastest, and the QLC NAND has real limitations under sustained writes, but for everyday use, gaming, and general storage, it's a great buy. If you see it on sale, grab it. If you're doing heavy video editing or constant large file transfers, spend more on a TLC drive.

Usage Scores

कुल (63.4)Budget (82.3)गेमिंग (46.5)Laptop (63.8)Console (23.2)Portable (14.6)Workstation (50.8)
  • कुल63.4
  • Budget82.3
  • गेमिंग46.5
  • Laptop63.8
  • Console23.2
  • Portable14.6
  • Workstation50.8

अन्य कॉन्फ़िगरेशन2

समान उत्पाद