Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 कुल स्कोर
vs
BLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm

BLAZAR LENS
51 कुल स्कोर

स्कोर

Portrait
Sigma
59
BLAZAR LENS
59
Budget
Sigma
56
BLAZAR LENS
47
Street
Sigma
46
BLAZAR LENS
53
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
BLAZAR LENS
50
Professional
Sigma
42
BLAZAR LENS
43
Macro
Sigma
16
BLAZAR LENS
42
Travel
Sigma
40
BLAZAR LENS
39
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
BLAZAR LENS
29
Landscape
Sigma
33
BLAZAR LENS
27

स्पेसिफिकेशन

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSBLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min16 mm32 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm32 mm
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5T3.2
Min ApertureT3.2
Constant
Build
MountNikon Z
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.29 kg
Filter Thread55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance460 mm

फायदे और नुकसान

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm

  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

फैसला

विजेता: BLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm

Scores 51 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 14 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS बेहतर:

BudgetLandscapeWildlife Sports

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 32mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 32mm बेहतर:

MacroStreetVideo Cinema