Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.2 S 35mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.2 S 35mm

Nikon
62 Score global

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
95
Nikon
70
Travel
Panasonic
91
Nikon
46
Landscape
Panasonic
91
Nikon
65
Budget
Panasonic
90
Nikon
58
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Nikon
61
Professional
Panasonic
85
Nikon
73
Portrait
Panasonic
82
Nikon
59
Street
Panasonic
82
Nikon
59
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
82
Nikon
60

Spécifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmNikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.2 S 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm35 mm
Elements1717
Groups1315
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements43
CoatingFluorine coatingMeso Amorphous & ARNEO Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountL-MountNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg1.06 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusDual STM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm300 mm
Max Magnification0.5x1:5

Avantages & Inconvénients

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.2 S 35mm

  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Strong social proof (65th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Gagnant: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports