Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Score global
vs
Pentax DA 18-135mm
Pentax
57 Score global
Scores
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Portrait
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Street
Video Cinema
Spécifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Pentax DA 18-135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | SP Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | 22-38★ |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Pentax K |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 400 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.2★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Pentax DA 18-135mm
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Verdict
Gagnant: Pentax DA 18-135mm
Scores 57 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.