Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Score global
vs
Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM

Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM

Canon
63 Score global

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Canon
49
Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
36
Street
Nikon
86
Canon
51
Budget
Nikon
86
Canon
72
Macro
Nikon
85
Canon
51
Landscape
Nikon
83
Canon
64
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Canon
54
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Canon
69
Travel
Nikon
75
Canon
61

Spécifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm100 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm400 mm
Elements1312
Groups119
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/45
Min Aperturef/2.85.6-8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.64 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm881 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.41x

Avantages & Inconvénients

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average aperture (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Verdict

Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports