Sigma 200110
Sigma
66 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Score global
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spécifications
| Sigma 200110 | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 12 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 24 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 13 |
| Groups | 12 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| Coating | Super Multi Coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4.5 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 4.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.61 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | HSM | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma 200110
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong macro (75th percentile)
- Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
- Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.