Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron
56 Score global
vs
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm

Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm

Sony
89 Score global

Scores

Professional
Tamron
44
Sony
99
Video Cinema
Tamron
49
Sony
93
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
39
Sony
91
Budget
Tamron
67
Sony
90
Travel
Tamron
50
Sony
88
Street
Tamron
48
Sony
88
Landscape
Tamron
37
Sony
87
Portrait
Tamron
61
Sony
85
Macro
Tamron
46
Sony
66

Spécifications

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mmSony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm135 mm
Elements18
Groups12
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements2
CoatingNano AR Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperturef/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon EF-SSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.54 kg0.42 kg
Filter Thread95 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSSM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm400 mm
Max Magnification0.15x

Avantages & Inconvénients

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (24th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average macro (34th percentile)

Prix

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm is 1 734 € cheaper (5.1x less).

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm0.130score par dollar
vs
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm0.041score par dollar

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.2x meilleur

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm

Verdict

Gagnant: Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi