Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
74 Score global
vs
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm
Sony
89 Score global
Scores
Professional
Video Cinema
Budget
Street
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Landscape
Macro
Spécifications
| Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 18 |
| Groups | 10 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| Coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas | Nano AR Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.42 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 95 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | SSM |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 400 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.15x★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
Prix
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B00.335score par dollar
vs
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm0.041score par dollar
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 offre un rapport qualité-prix 8.2x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
