Sony WH1000XM6B.UC
Sony
17 Score global
vs
JBL Tune 670NC
JBL
92 Score global
Scores
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Work
Music
Studio
Calls
Spécifications
| Sony WH1000XM6B.UC | JBL Tune 670NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | — | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.25 kg | 0.17 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | soft ear cushions |
| Headband | — | padded headband |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 32 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 98 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 95 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✗ |
| Codecs | — | SBC, AAC, LC3 |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Cable Length | — | 1.2192000150680542 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 690 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 1★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sony WH1000XM6B.UC
- Below average connectivity (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average sound (25th percentile)
JBL Tune 670NC
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
Prix
Sony WH1000XM6B.UC0.036score par dollar
vs
JBL Tune 670NC1.099score par dollar
JBL Tune 670NC offre un rapport qualité-prix 30.5x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: JBL Tune 670NC
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 39 specs.
