FLATIC CDR2H

FLATIC CDR2H

FLATIC
43 Score global
vs
FlyFrost DC226 2026

FlyFrost DC226 2026

FlyFrost
44 Score global

Scores

Product Photography
FLATIC
55
FlyFrost
55
Youtube
FLATIC
52
FlyFrost
47
Beginner
FLATIC
52
FlyFrost
45
Video
FLATIC
47
FlyFrost
50
Photography
FLATIC
44
FlyFrost
47
Vlogging
FLATIC
43
FlyFrost
34
Streaming
FLATIC
43
FlyFrost
40
Wedding Events
FLATIC
38
FlyFrost
40
Sports Wildlife
FLATIC
30
FlyFrost
31
Travel
FLATIC
28
FlyFrost
29

Spécifications

FLATIC CDR2HFlyFrost DC226
Sensor
TypeCMOSCMOS
Size1/3-inch
Megapixels64 MP88 MP
Video
Max Resolution5K8K
Log Profile
Display & EVF
Screen Size3.2"
Touchscreen
Articulating
Build
Weight0.78 kg1.03 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
USBType-C

Avantages & Inconvénients

FLATIC CDR2H

  • Strong sensor (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong video (79th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
  • Strong display (68th percentile)
  • Below average burst (32nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

FlyFrost DC226 2026

  • Strong sensor (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong video (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average burst (32nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Verdict

Égalité

Both products are closely matched - FLATIC CDR2H wins 2 specs while FlyFrost DC226 wins 4.

FLATIC CDR2H Meilleur pour:

YoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreaming

FlyFrost DC226 Meilleur pour:

VideoPhotographyWedding Events