SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Puntuación general
vs
Samsung 950 PRO 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung 950 PRO 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung
62 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Console
SanDisk
85
Samsung
24
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Samsung
66
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Samsung
50
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Samsung
60
Budget
SanDisk
57
Samsung
42
Portable
SanDisk
23
Samsung
14

Especificaciones

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Samsung 950 PRO
Drive
Capacity
8,000
512
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
2,500
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
1,500
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
300,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
110,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
ControllernCache 4.0Samsung UBX controller
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
400
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Sin datos
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★✗
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Pros y Contras

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Samsung 950 PRO 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong random (79th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average capacity (35th percentile)

Veredicto

★ Ganador: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Mejor en:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation