Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6

Canon
47 Puntuación general
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Professional
Canon
47
Nikon
95
Portrait
Canon
53
Nikon
89
Street
Canon
50
Nikon
86
Budget
Canon
57
Nikon
86
Macro
Canon
29
Nikon
85
Landscape
Canon
38
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
51
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Canon
47
Nikon
78
Travel
Canon
40
Nikon
75

Especificaciones

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typetelephoto-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min75 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm28 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingSuper Spectra CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5.6f/2.8
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.93 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.49 m190 mm
Max Magnification0.25x1:5.26

Pros y Contras

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (29th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Veredicto

Ganador: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports