MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5
MSI
16 Puntuación general
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR5
AMD
81 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Server
Productivity
Ai Llm
Gaming
Budget
Efficiency
Especificaciones
| MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Series | Ryzen 9 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO |
| Model | 9000 | 7985WX |
| Codename | — | Storm Peak |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 5★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 64★ |
| Threads | Sin datos | |
| Base Clock | Sin datos | |
| Boost Clock | Sin datos | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 64★ |
| L3 Cache | Sin datos | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | Sin datos | |
| PassMark Single | Sin datos | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 8★ |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | Sin datos | |
| TDP | — | 350★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 350★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | None |
Pros y Contras
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5
- Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR5
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Below average affordability (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Precios
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.041puntos por dólar
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR50.009puntos por dólar
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5 ofrece 4.6x mejor relación calidad-precio
Veredicto
Ganador: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Scores 81 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 26 specs.
