Crucial BX500 1TB SATA III 2.5"

Crucial BX500 1TB SATA III 2.5"

Crucial
56 Overall Score
vs
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Overall Score

Scores

Console
Crucial
22
SanDisk
85
Workstation
Crucial
50
SanDisk
85
Gaming
Crucial
44
SanDisk
84
Budget
Crucial
84
SanDisk
57
Laptop
Crucial
54
SanDisk
65
Portable
Crucial
14
SanDisk
23

Specifications

Crucial BX500SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Drive
Capacity
1,000
8,000
Form Factor2.5"M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—5★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
540
14,900
Sequential Write (MB/s)
500
13,200
Random Read (IOPS)
100,000
2,200,000
Random Write (IOPS)
80,000
2,400,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
Controller—nCache 4.0
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
360
4,800
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,750,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✗✓★
Hardware Encryption✗✓★

Pros & Cons

Crucial BX500 1TB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong endurance (71st percentile)
  • Below average speed (25th percentile)

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

Crucial BX500 Better at:

Budget

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Better at:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation