Kingston KVR16N11/8
Kingston
31 Overall Score
vs
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
Crucial
61 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| Kingston KVR16N11/8 | Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 240 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 11★ | 22 |
| Timings | 11-11-11 | 22-22-22 |
| Voltage | 1.5 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Kingston KVR16N11/8
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Pricing
Kingston KVR16N11/80.981score per dollar
vs
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A0.339score per dollar
Kingston KVR16N11/8 offers 2.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
Scores 61 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
