Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4

Kingston
26 Overall Score
vs
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

Crucial
61 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Kingston
39
Crucial
75
Gaming
Kingston
23
Crucial
64
Workstation
Kingston
19
Crucial
60
Laptop
Kingston
20
Crucial
45
Server
Kingston
10
Crucial
29

Specifications

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
Memory
TypeDDR3LDDR4★
Form FactorUDIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
4,096
16,384
Modules11
Per Module
4,096
16,384
Pins240288
Rank—1Rx8
Performance
Speed
1,600
3,200
CAS Latency11★22
Timings—22-22-22
Voltage1.3500000238418581.2000000476837158★
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC Profile—Intel XMP 2.0
Features
RGB✗✗
Heat Spreader—✗

Pros & Cons

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4

  • Below average capacity (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile

Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Pricing

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4 is €161 cheaper (9.4x less).

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/41.340score per dollar
vs
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A0.339score per dollar

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4 offers 4.0x better value for money

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4

Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

Verdict

★ Winner: Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

Scores 61 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.

Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

Also Consider