ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 2022
ViewSonic
84 Overall Score
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG249QL3A 23.8" 2023
ASUS
62 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Gaming
Portable
Specifications
| ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" | ASUS TUF Gaming VG249QL3A 23.8" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 32" | 23.8" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 180 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 5 ms | 1 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | Adaptive-Sync | FreeSync Premium★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits | 350 nits |
| Color Gamut | 95% DCI-P3, 95% sRGB, 128% sRGB | 99% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10 bit (8 bit + A-FRC) | 8-bit★ |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1★ | 0 |
| Thunderbolt | No | — |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Power | 46W | 18W★ |
| Weight | 10.89 kg | 5.40 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 2022
- Strong display (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong color (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
ASUS TUF Gaming VG249QL3A 23.8" 2023
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong user sentiment (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong performance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong color (69th percentile)
- Below average display (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
- Below average social proof (32nd percentile)
Pricing
ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 20220.138score per dollar
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG249QL3A 23.8" 20230.274score per dollar
ASUS TUF Gaming VG249QL3A 23.8" 2023 offers 2.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32"
Scores 84 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 29 specs.
