Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm

Fujifilm
69 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

88 out of 100 medium confidence 20 reviews

The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a versatile and affordable alternative to Sony's GM lenses. Users appreciate its performance in portraits and low light, though some note the plastic build and lack of weather sealing as drawbacks. Overall, it is considered an excellent value for both enthusiasts and professionals.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile focal range
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Plastic build quality
  • No weather sealing
  • Zoom ring reversed from focus ring
  • Slightly long for discrete use
  • Colors slightly duller than GM lenses
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Autofocus performance 10
🤔 Build quality 8
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Weight and portability 6
👍 Low light performance 5

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm

88 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2.8 lens is praised for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and weather sealing, making it a versatile workhorse for various photography needs. While many users appreciate its build quality and optical performance, the notable weight and lack of image stabilization are common drawbacks, especially for travel or handheld use. Overall, it is considered a fantastic all-around lens despite these trade-offs.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Weather-sealed construction
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • Versatile zoom range
Cons
  • Heavy weight
  • No image stabilization
  • High price
  • No lens hood included
  • Incorrect filter size image in product listing
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Build quality 5
🤔 Image stabilization 3
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4

Scores

Budget
Tamron
100
Fujifilm
75
Professional
Tamron
99
Fujifilm
75
Video Cinema
Tamron
98
Fujifilm
81
Macro
Tamron
95
Fujifilm
59
Portrait
Tamron
94
Fujifilm
51
Landscape
Tamron
89
Fujifilm
80
Street
Tamron
87
Fujifilm
61
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
87
Fujifilm
81
Travel
Tamron
80
Fujifilm
67

Specifications

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max75 mm140 mm
Elements1723
Groups1516
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements26★
CoatingFluorine CoatingNano-GI (Gradient Index) coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.54 kg★0.99 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motorTriple Linear Motor
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance180 mm★1.00 m
Max Magnification1:2.7★0.12x

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average macro (27th percentile)

Pricing

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

No current pricing available

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider