TTArtisan 11mm f/2.8 11mm

TTArtisan 11mm f/2.8 11mm

TTArtisan
59 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
TTArtisan
67
Sigma
100
Landscape
TTArtisan
34
Sigma
100
Budget
TTArtisan
54
Sigma
99
Travel
TTArtisan
35
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
44
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
31
Sigma
87
Portrait
TTArtisan
63
Sigma
85
Professional
TTArtisan
42
Sigma
84
Street
TTArtisan
53
Sigma
80

Specifications

TTArtisan 11mm f/2.8 11mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typefisheyezoom
Focal Length Min11 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max11 mm300 mm
Elements1120
Groups714
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/163.5-6.7
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
FormatFull-Frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.44 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeManual FocusHLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance170 mm170 mm
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

TTArtisan 11mm f/2.8 11mm

  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (70th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports