Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 336mm

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 336mm

Canon
55 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
99 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Canon
43
Sigma
100
Budget
Canon
62
Sigma
99
Macro
Canon
43
Sigma
96
Travel
Canon
48
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Canon
50
Sigma
91
Portrait
Canon
58
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Canon
48
Sigma
87
Professional
Canon
39
Sigma
84
Street
Canon
46
Sigma
79

Specifications

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 336mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min55 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max210 mm300 mm
Elements—20
Groups—14
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5f/3.5
Min Aperture5-7.13.5-6.7
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.67 kg0.61 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★HLA
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance701 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 336mm

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong versatility (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (19th percentile)19th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 99 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports