Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon Cine DS135M-C 135mm

Rokinon Cine DS135M-C 135mm

Rokinon
28 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
98
Rokinon
37
Budget
Panasonic
91
Rokinon
26
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Rokinon
24
Travel
Panasonic
86
Rokinon
17
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Rokinon
27
Street
Panasonic
80
Rokinon
22
Professional
Panasonic
80
Rokinon
25
Portrait
Panasonic
77
Rokinon
24
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Rokinon
18

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmRokinon Cine DS135M-C 135mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min28 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm135 mm
Elements1711
Groups137
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements4★1
CoatingFluorine coatingUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4T22
Min Aperture4-7.1T2.2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.41 kg★0.82 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusmanual focus only
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★800 mm
Max Magnification0.5x★—

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Rokinon Cine DS135M-C 135mm

  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average build (23rd percentile)

Pricing

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

No current pricing available

Rokinon Cine DS135M-C 135mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider