Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma
96 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
88 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

95 out of 100 high confidence 36 reviews

The Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC DN Art lens is overwhelmingly praised for its exceptional image quality, fast constant aperture, and compact internal zoom design. Users highlight its sharpness, lightweight build, and excellent autofocus performance, especially on crop-sensor mirrorless cameras like the Canon R7 and Fujifilm bodies. A few questions about compatibility with specific cameras and features like weather sealing and aperture ring are noted, but the overall sentiment is extremely positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional image quality
  • Fast constant f/1.8 aperture
  • Compact internal zoom design
  • Lightweight build
  • Sharp and bright photos
Cons
  • No weather sealing mentioned
  • No manual aperture ring on some mounts
  • Compatibility questions with full-frame cameras
  • Expensive for some buyers
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Aperture 7
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Autofocus 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Compatibility 12

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

78 out of 100 high confidence 459 reviews

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and robust build quality. Many users consider it a workhorse for sports, portraits, and low-light photography, though the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback for some. A significant number of reviews highlight the lens's weight and the potential for focus inconsistencies, particularly with moving subjects. Concerns about Canon's support for older models and the tripod collar design also appear in negative feedback.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness and image quality
  • Fast and silent autofocus (USM)
  • Excellent for low-light photography
  • Versatile for sports and portraits
  • Robust build quality
Cons
  • No image stabilization
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Tripod collar design issues
  • Inconsistent autofocus with moving subjects
  • Canon no longer supports repairs
👍 Image quality 35
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👎 Weight and size 18
👎 Image stabilization 15
👍 Value for money 12

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
93
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Sigma
89
Canon
95
Budget
Sigma
87
Canon
94
Professional
Sigma
89
Canon
93
Street
Sigma
79
Canon
84
Landscape
Sigma
79
Canon
84
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
68
Canon
83
Macro
Sigma
82
Canon
69
Travel
Sigma
81
Canon
77

Specifications

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DCCanon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm200 mm
Elements1717
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements4★2
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountFujifilm XCanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.54 kg★1.07 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLA (High-response Linear Actuator)Dual Nano USM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★700 mm
Max Magnification1:4.8★0.23x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Scores 96 overall, wins 2 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Better at:

MacroTravel

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Better at:

BudgetStreetLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports