Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

Carl Zeiss
35 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic
72 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Carl Zeiss
28
Panasonic
83
Portrait
Carl Zeiss
53
Panasonic
78
Street
Carl Zeiss
39
Panasonic
78
Budget
Carl Zeiss
42
Panasonic
76
Wildlife Sports
Carl Zeiss
28
Panasonic
74
Video Cinema
Carl Zeiss
34
Panasonic
74
Travel
Carl Zeiss
18
Panasonic
68
Landscape
Carl Zeiss
16
Panasonic
64
Macro
Carl Zeiss
15
Panasonic
55

Specifications

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min18 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm35 mm
Elements12
Groups9
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements1
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-Mount
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.72 kg0.50 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typedouble-magnet linear motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm
Max Magnification0.23x

Pros & Cons

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

  • Strong aperture (70th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (68th percentile)
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong build (70th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 20 specs.

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports