Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Overall Score
vs
BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm

BLAZAR LENS
46 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Canon
91
BLAZAR LENS
41
Landscape
Canon
83
BLAZAR LENS
25
Video Cinema
Canon
83
BLAZAR LENS
44
Professional
Canon
82
BLAZAR LENS
39
Travel
Canon
82
BLAZAR LENS
36
Budget
Canon
80
BLAZAR LENS
41
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
BLAZAR LENS
37
Street
Canon
68
BLAZAR LENS
54
Portrait
Canon
53
BLAZAR LENS
53

Specifications

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMBLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min28 mm65 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm65 mm
Elements15
Groups12
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon RFL-Mount
Formatfull-frameFull-Frame (36 x 24 mm Sensor)
Weather Sealed
Weight0.49 kg0.29 kg
Filter Thread67 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance239 mm460 mm
Max Magnification1:4.2

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm

  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports