Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD

Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD

Tamron
63 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Tamron
52
Portrait
Nikon
89
Tamron
32
Street
Nikon
86
Tamron
45
Budget
Nikon
86
Tamron
66
Macro
Nikon
85
Tamron
68
Landscape
Nikon
83
Tamron
71
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Tamron
40
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Tamron
54
Travel
Nikon
75
Tamron
75

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm200 mm
Elements1319
Groups1114
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/32
Min Aperturef/2.82.8-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.58 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorRXD
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:3.1

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD

  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports