Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR Lens 32-64mm

Fujifilm GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR Lens 32-64mm

Fujifilm
74 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
93
Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
88
Macro
Nikon
88
Fujifilm
59
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
78
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
76
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
81
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
81
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
70
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
77

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR Lens 32-64mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm32 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm64 mm
Elements1314
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZG Mount
Formatfull-frame★medium-format
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.10 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorLinear motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.12x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR Lens 32-64mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Fujifilm GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR Lens 32-64mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetPortraitLandscape

Fujifilm GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR Lens 32-64mm Better at:

StreetTravelWildlife Sports

Also Consider