Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Tokina atx-i 11-16mm f/2.8 CF 16mm

Tokina atx-i 11-16mm f/2.8 CF 16mm

Tokina
53 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Tokina
47
Budget
Nikon
85
Tokina
52
Street
Nikon
84
Tokina
43
Macro
Nikon
84
Tokina
60
Portrait
Nikon
84
Tokina
36
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Tokina
44
Landscape
Nikon
79
Tokina
47
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Tokina
39
Travel
Nikon
70
Tokina
40

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Tokina atx-i 11-16mm f/2.8 CF 16mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm11 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm16 mm
Elements1313
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.45 kg★0.56 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★300 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:11

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Tokina atx-i 11-16mm f/2.8 CF 16mm

  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Strong versatility (67th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports