Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM 60mm

Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM 60mm

Canon
72 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Canon
76
Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
79
Macro
Nikon
85
Canon
87
Street
Nikon
86
Canon
75
Budget
Nikon
86
Canon
62
Landscape
Nikon
83
Canon
49
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Canon
79
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Canon
67
Travel
Nikon
75
Canon
47

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM 60mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm60 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm60 mm
Elements1312
Groups118
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.34 kg
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorUSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm198 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:1

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM 60mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong macro (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM 60mm Better at:

Macro