Canon RF 10-20mm F4 L IS STM Ultra-Wide-Angle

Canon RF 10-20mm F4 L IS STM Ultra-Wide-Angle

Canon
66 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Canon
76
Nikon
95
Portrait
Canon
50
Nikon
89
Street
Canon
59
Nikon
86
Budget
Canon
64
Nikon
86
Macro
Canon
59
Nikon
85
Landscape
Canon
83
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
69
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Canon
73
Nikon
78
Travel
Canon
64
Nikon
75

Specifications

Canon RF 10-20mm F4 L IS STM Ultra-Wide-AngleNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min10 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max20 mm28 mm
Elements1613
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements43
CoatingAir Sphere and SWC CoatingsMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.59 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance249 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.12x1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 10-20mm F4 L IS STM Ultra-Wide-Angle

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports