Tamron Di AFA037N700 17-35mm

Tamron Di AFA037N700 17-35mm

Tamron
66 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Tamron
65
Panasonic
96
Budget
Tamron
64
Panasonic
92
Landscape
Tamron
55
Panasonic
90
Travel
Tamron
61
Panasonic
90
Video Cinema
Tamron
59
Panasonic
86
Professional
Tamron
64
Panasonic
86
Portrait
Tamron
73
Panasonic
84
Street
Tamron
64
Panasonic
83
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
63
Panasonic
82

Specifications

Tamron Di AFA037N700 17-35mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements17
Groups13
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
Coatingprotective fluorine compoundFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperture2.8-44-7.1
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon FL-Mount
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.46 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeOSDAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm140 mm
Max Magnification0.5x

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di AFA037N700 17-35mm

  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports