Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

Panasonic
85 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Sports 185955 500mm

Sigma Sports 185955 500mm

Sigma
39 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

88 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Panasonic LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 lens is highly praised for its versatility, image quality, and value, especially as an all-around zoom for L-mount cameras like the Leica SL and Panasonic S series. Users consistently highlight its excellent stabilization, macro capabilities, and weather sealing, though some note it is not the sharpest at pixel level and the OIS switch can be soft. Overall, it is seen as a practical, lighter alternative to the Leica 24-90, with many calling it a go-to lens for both photo and video.

Pros
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • Great macro capabilities
  • Weather-sealed build
  • Versatile 24-105mm focal range
  • Constant f/4 aperture
Cons
  • Not the sharpest at pixel level
  • Soft OIS switch
  • Slightly slower autofocus than kit lens
  • Heavy for some users
  • Large lens bag included
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Image stabilization 5
👍 Macro capability 5
👍 Build quality 4
🤔 Weight and size 5
👍 Autofocus performance 4

Sigma Sports 185955 500mm

86 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

The Sigma 500mm f/4 Sports lens wins strong praise for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and solid build. Users note it pairs well with Nikon Z-series cameras via the FTZ adapter and delivers excellent image quality for wildlife and bird photography, especially in low light. A few caution that it's heavy for prolonged handheld use, but most find it well-balanced. The lens is seen as a cost-effective alternative to pricier OEM primes, with the added benefit of customization via the Sigma Lens Dock.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Solid build quality
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Well-balanced design
Cons
  • Heavy for handheld use
  • Expensive initial cost
👍 Image quality 5
👍 Autofocus speed 3
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 2
👎 Weight 3
👍 Low light performance 3

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
89
Sigma
41
Budget
Panasonic
83
Sigma
34
Professional
Panasonic
80
Sigma
42
Video Cinema
Panasonic
80
Sigma
42
Portrait
Panasonic
79
Sigma
27
Landscape
Panasonic
76
Sigma
44
Travel
Panasonic
68
Sigma
31
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
67
Sigma
39
Street
Panasonic
67
Sigma
31

Specifications

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.Sigma Sports 185955 500mm
Optics
Typezoomsuper-telephoto
Focal Length Min24 mm500 mm
Focal Length Max105 mm500 mm
Elements1616
Groups1311
Aspherical Elements4★0
ED Elements4★3
Coating—Super Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/32
Min Aperturef/4f/4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight1.18 kg★3.17 kg
Filter Thread77 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto FocusHSM
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops6 stops★4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm★3.50 m
Max Magnification1:2★0.15x

Pros & Cons

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (24th percentile)

Sigma Sports 185955 500mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average build (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average macro (27th percentile)

Pricing

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

No current pricing available

Sigma Sports 185955 500mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S. Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider