Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon
66 Overall Score
vs
Laowa 58mm f/2.8

Laowa 58mm f/2.8

Laowa
68 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Canon
59
Laowa
82
Wildlife Sports
Canon
78
Laowa
44
Portrait
Canon
49
Laowa
77
Landscape
Canon
73
Laowa
40
Professional
Canon
71
Laowa
54
Video Cinema
Canon
66
Laowa
54
Budget
Canon
66
Laowa
60
Street
Canon
56
Laowa
61
Travel
Canon
61
Laowa
36

Specifications

Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USMLaowa 58mm f/2.8
Optics
Typetelephoto
Focal Length Min100 mm58 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm58 mm
Elements2314
Groups1811
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingASC, SSC, and Fluorine Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/22
Constant
Diaphragm Blades913
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-frameFull-Frame
Weather Sealed
Weight2.59 kg0.59 kg
Filter Thread112 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeDual Nano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.80 m185 mm
Max Magnification1:6.252:1

Pros & Cons

Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Laowa 58mm f/2.8

  • Strong macro (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM

No current pricing available

Laowa 58mm f/2.8

Verdict

Winner: Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Better at:

BudgetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Laowa 58mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroStreetPortrait

Also Consider