Sigma Sports 740101 150-600mm

Sigma Sports 740101 150-600mm

Sigma
49 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
86 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma Sports 740101 150-600mm

82 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

The Sigma 150-600mm Sport lens is praised for its excellent image quality, effective image stabilization, and solid build. However, its significant weight and bulk are common criticisms, making it less ideal for casual hikes or extended handheld use. Many users recommend pairing it with a tripod or monopod and the Sigma USB dock for fine-tuning autofocus.

Pros
  • Excellent image quality
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Solid build quality
  • Good value for money
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Very heavy and bulky
  • Tripod collar not removable
  • Fabric lens cap is inconvenient
  • Metal hood adds weight
  • Zoom ring is stiff
👍 Image quality 8
👎 Weight and size 8
👍 Image stabilization 5
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Value for money 5

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Scores

Budget
Sigma
55
Canon
90
Travel
Sigma
49
Canon
85
Street
Sigma
50
Canon
81
Portrait
Sigma
62
Canon
80
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
51
Canon
78
Video Cinema
Sigma
51
Canon
77
Landscape
Sigma
52
Canon
74
Professional
Sigma
51
Canon
68
Macro
Sigma
34
Canon
62

Specifications

Sigma Sports 740101 150-600mmCanon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min150 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max600 mm250 mm
Elements515
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements—0★
ED Elements5★1
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/4
Min Aperture3.5-6.34-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon EFCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight2.86 kg0.38 kg★
Filter Thread105 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHyper Sonic MotorSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—850 mm★
Max Magnification—0.29x★

Pros & Cons

Sigma Sports 740101 150-600mm

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
  • Strong aperture (71st percentile)
  • Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Sports 740101 150-600mm

No current pricing available

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider